Tags:
Word.
Another amusing tidbit that people seem to forget is that we're talking about 3rd world here. Most of the farmers we deal with could not afford pesticides if they wanted them. And they sure as hell can't afford to have their farm/co-op/processing center/etc. certified. The simple fact is that most coffee is organic, certified or not. The people using loads of pesticides are the people producing massive amounts of low quality coffee. I would not be surprised to find that most Vietnamese coffee and lots of Brazilian coffee are treated. No offence to those origins, they're just mass producers of coffee.
The fact is that "organic" and "shade grown" and "fair trade" are all businesses. And any business' prime directive is to stay in business. I don't dislike those businesses. I think that they are steps in the right direction. But rather than supporting a flawed system, i say we pass that money strait on to the farmer who earned it.
Randy Evans said:I can't help but to wonder if it's a bunch of b.s.? Just because a grower chooses not to certify or become FT through a coop, should we not buy that growers coffee? It just doesn't seem sustainable to me to only purchase coffee from a coop or eliminate the larger estates that are doing all the right things (but can't certify due to not meeting the criteria of a third party). I also believe there is some crappy coffee out there that is certified (just because it says "certified blah blah blah", doesn't mean it's good!). Being 100% Organic is the easy way out. The focus for me is always in the cup and supporting the farmers that are growing exceptional coffee. I believe that if the coffee tastes great, then the grower(s) are doing something right and I want to reward their efforts.
We all like to feel good about what we're purchasing and putting into our bodies, and for that I think FT and Organic has been very successful about creating awareness. And no doubt, FT should be commended for their efforts and have improved many lives. I just think that the model is not all-encompassing and the consumer doesn't understand this. As a roaster, we carry both certified and non-certified coffees. Many of our non-certified coffees have performed well in cup-of-excellence competitions and cost way more than the certified coffees. The challenging part is communicating this to our customer who somehow is misled into believing if it's not FT and/or certified organic, then someone is getting screwed or the coffee is loaded with chemicals. Transparency is always our goal, it's just not always easy to provide. Sometimes I think it would be easier to purchase 100% certified, but I know that I and my customers would be losing out on some amazing coffees.
Just my two cents...please don't crucify me! :-)
Agree with much that's been said so far.
I'll speak only to the "customer" aspect of this issue, since that was the OP's question. The answer to these questions, of course, is "it varies"...
In some markets, if you do not carry a couple of organic options, you will lose business. In other markets it will not matter. For example, a shop across town from us serves coffees from the same roaster (Dilworth), yet carries very few of the same coffees we do. They were pretty much forced to drop their organic offerings because their customers would avoid them when they were brewed. This included 3 certified organic coffees that were top sellers in our store. I found this pretty bizarre, but the lesson is "listen to your customers". I guess another lesson is "educate your customers".
Most shops that I've seen carry a mix. We follow this model too, and it works.
I've had both great and mediocre organic coffees.
Wow. I'm both shocked and pleased by the quality and thoughtfulness of the responses thus far.
I am still very much a rookie in the barista game, and to be honest I hadn't thought about some farmers not being able to officially certify their products or about the possibility that it could be a way to forge a divide between those with the option and those that lack such an option, be it due financial or some other constraints. But it all makes sense!
When it comes to deciding what to sell, my fear is that if I am selling two brewed, drip coffees and one is marked, "Organic" (OG) and the other isn't, that I may be inadvertently hurting sales of that non-OG blend by drawing attention to the fact that it is not OG (or at least not certified!). With that in mind, I'm inclined to move towards the 100% OG camp. Furthermore, I am speculating that customers will not look at the 'all coffees are 100% organic' label or sign and shy away because they are anti-organic.
But as Brady said, the customers will inevitably have input on this as well. I'll definitely be surveying potential customers for their thoughts and I believe this will be one of the more interesting and thought-provoking questions. I do intend to educate and add to the social consciousness that exists amongst patrons, but I think the final decision will be subject to what they feel their needs are.
I really like the idea of visiting the farmer/farm where I would be purchasing my coffee from. I'd like to see their operation, shake hands with the workers, and take some pictures of where the products we well are harvested and the people who make it all happen. I'll be posting another question about this in the 'Origin Trips' section of BX.
For every question I've asked on here, the answers have spawned at least 10 more! It's great!
I can't help but to wonder if it's a bunch of b.s.? Just because a grower chooses not to certify or become FT through a coop, should we not buy that growers coffee? It just doesn't seem sustainable to me to only purchase coffee from a coop or eliminate the larger estates that are doing all the right things (but can't certify due to not meeting the criteria of a third party). I also believe there is some crappy coffee out there that is certified (just because it says "certified blah blah blah", doesn't mean it's good!). Being 100% Organic is the easy way out. The focus for me is always in the cup and supporting the farmers that are growing exceptional coffee. I believe that if the coffee tastes great, then the grower(s) are doing something right and I want to reward their efforts.
We all like to feel good about what we're purchasing and putting into our bodies, and for that I think FT and Organic has been very successful about creating awareness. And no doubt, FT should be commended for their efforts and have improved many lives. I just think that the model is not all-encompassing and the consumer doesn't understand this. As a roaster, we carry both certified and non-certified coffees. Many of our non-certified coffees have performed well in cup-of-excellence competitions and cost way more than the certified coffees. The challenging part is communicating this to our customer who somehow is misled into believing if it's not FT and/or certified organic, then someone is getting screwed or the coffee is loaded with chemicals. Transparency is always our goal, it's just not always easy to provide. Sometimes I think it would be easier to purchase 100% certified, but I know that I and my customers would be losing out on some amazing coffees.
Just my two cents...please don't crucify me! :-)
Are you enjoying Barista Exchange? Is it helping you promote your business and helping you network in this great industry? Donate today to keep it free to all members. Supporters can join the "Supporters Group" with a donation. Thanks!
© 2024 Created by Matt Milletto. Powered by