Comment

Comment by Jason Haeger on May 30, 2008 at 11:04am

rofl! I suppose it does reed the same as if one had read it.

Comment by rob on May 30, 2008 at 10:54am

it reeds the same

Comment by Jason Haeger on May 30, 2008 at 10:48am

Maybe, but I think fighting ridiculousness would be more effective than fighting rediculousness.

(p.s. - any government involvement with an issue like this is ridiculous)

Comment by rob on May 30, 2008 at 8:22am

maybe we should start up a legal defense fund and put an end to corporate monopolization and rediculousness right here and now....

Comment by Jason Haeger on May 30, 2008 at 1:45am

I guess this means I have the right to sue any photo of someone pouring any drink at all with their right hand.

Sweet.

Comment by rob on May 29, 2008 at 8:25pm

Starsucks TM is now trademarking every letter of the alphabet that corresponds to their name in fact. All of the past comments (including this one) are in direct violation of these copyright laws. The papers are in the mail.

Comment by Jason Dominy on May 29, 2008 at 8:06pm

This just in: Coffee is now a Charbucks trademarked word. Recognize. ;-)

Comment by Alex Negranza on May 29, 2008 at 8:00pm

SBUX (*$) needs to stop with this lawsuit stuff. It's so ridiculous.

Comment by Kristen on May 29, 2008 at 7:44pm

circles and stars are trademarked now?

Comment by Joe Stormer on May 29, 2008 at 11:18am

We've also caught wind that Starbucks is forming a suit against Stickman, as well, for trademark infringement. Apparently, the Stickman figure bears an uncanny resemblance from the waist up to their mermaid's skeletal structure. We knew that it would come to this sooner or later, we just never thought it would happen this soon!