Define "Specialty"
The term "Specialty" is used everday in our industry to describe many different things.
What does it really mean?
What does it mean to you?
What does it really mean?
What does it mean to you?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Jason Haeger on
-
"Girly" or "Fancy" used in a negative manner.
That's the best way I can describe it.
-
Permalink Reply by Paperman's Coffee House on
-
Any coffee a consumer is willing to pay a premium for.
-
Permalink Reply by Lindsay Gray on
-
Hi there. This is my interpretation, but I am ready to stand corrected if someone has a better definition.
There are actually two different interpretations for "specialty coffee", and Bel has come the closest to explaining it. Five or more years ago, when most roasters were using Robusta in blends, specialty coffee was regarded as (roasted) 100% Arabica, and predominantly A-grade coffee. This was coffee available in commercial quantities such as Colombian Supremo, Guatemalan Antigua, etc etc.
Recently however, specialty coffee is more referring to single origin green coffee's that are not necessarily available in large commercial quantities, and that cup at least 70 or above in judging competitions. For example a Colombian Huila and Cundinamarca were judged last year as specialty coffee's, and are marked as such on the (hessian) bags. They may be, but are not necessarily, single estate coffee's, they may be the best of the best aggregated from a particular regions top farms. The importer or trader should also be able to supply a cupping profile and score sheet for the "specialty coffee".
Hope this helps, and congratulations to all for a great site. Lindsay (newbie)
-
Permalink Reply by Bel Townsend on
-
thanks Lindsay, that's really helpful. I didn't know that speciality ones had to be 70 and above.
My uni project is about the speciality coffee industry - which is great until I realised I don't have a working definition of what that actually is!
-
Permalink Reply by Chris DeMarse on
-
I like where the discussion is going, and Bel seems to have a good grasp on what its origins are. I would also agree in saying that "specialty" is about as defined as "third wave". They are both general terms with ambiguity attached to their definitions. If I can go to a coffee shop that is doing 12 second shots and bubbly foam and they make the same claim to be specialty as a fine establishment serving single origins in a french press and pouring rosettas on perfectly extracted espresso, then I would have to argue that the original definition has been lost in marketing and, in essence, means very little when trying to indicate the actual quality of coffee. I prefer the term "gourmet" because it as always been set apart as a defining characteristic in the food world.
-
Permalink Reply by Peter Tam on
-
I do not quite agree with Lindsay Gray's explanation.
The SCAA was established about 20 or less years ago, and their initial definition is the "specialty coffee", which was defined long ago.
About the pure arabica blending and even single origin espresso beans are not really good. If they change their definition of "specialty coffee" to those concepts, they must loose its position in the coffee industry.
As far as I remeber, their original definition includes two parts; one is the high grades of single origin beans, not necessarily used for espresso but better for drip coffee; and the other is espresso drinks, which dominates the cafes around the world, although the milk mixed drinks are much more than espresso its self. We are going to change the world to make espresso more than those milk mixed drinks.
Those poor guys are killing espresso, and make it out of our world. That is the reason why I call our trainees to survive espresso for our world.
It seems that people are waiting, even if I do not know what they are waiting for. But, the ......
Let's see how long it can last.
-
-
Doesn't the SCAA define "specialty coffee" as a green grade based on numbers of secondary and primary defects?
"Specialty Grade" has no primary defects, and I think a maximum of two secondary defects, if memory serves. (it may not)
The rest of these developments that everyone is talking about have pushed the quality coffee industry forward, but the definition hasn't changed, to my knowledge.
I'm pretty sure we all drink a whole lot of "high quality" coffees (premium grade or so) that aren't really "specialty grade" due to defects, even though the cupping score would be above the mid-80's.
Are we mislabeling the term when we call ourselves "specialty coffee retailers", or "specialty coffee roasters"?
I'd hope not, but it we may be doing exactly that. Or maybe, it's time for the definition to keep up with the times, however, if it's a grade, there needs to be a way to quantify the label.
-
Permalink Reply by Kyle Glanville on
-
80+
-
Permalink Reply by The Barista Formerly Known As JavaJ on
-
"Specialty Coffee
The Definition of Specialty Coffee
by Don Holly, Administrative Director, SCAA
My understanding of the origin of the term "specialty coffee" is that it was first coined by Erna Knutsen, of Knutsen Coffee Ltd., in a speech to the delegates of an international coffee conference in Montreuil, France, in 1978. In essence, the concept was quite simple: special geographic microclimates produce beans with unique flavor profiles, which she referred to as "specialty coffees." Underlying this idea of coffee appellations, was the fundamental premise that specialty coffee beans would always be well prepared, freshly roasted, and properly brewed. This was the craft of the specialty coffee industry that had been slowly evolving during the twenty-year period preceding her speech. The Specialty Coffee Association of America (SCAA) continues to define specialty in this context. Our job is to continue to promote this definition through the actions of our membership.
The definition of specialty coffee should begin at the origin of coffee, the planting of a particular varietal into a particular growing region of the world. Some varieties of Arabica are clearly capable of producing specialty coffee. There are others that probably never will. The traditional cultivars of typica and bourbon, and the more recent variety of catuai, and other closely related varieties, are the most obvious producers of specialty coffees. Strains with robusta in their heritage always seem to fall far short in flavor profile. But the definition cannot stop there. A poorly grown, harvested or processed typica or bourbon can still be awful in the cup. The concept of specialty must include the care given to the plant through harvest and preparation for export. Likewise, there are regions that have proven their ability to grow great coffees due to altitude, latitude, soil and other attributes. Other regions have not demonstrated such ability.
The Green Coffee Classification Chart produced by SCAA Executive Director, Ted Lingle, years ago clearly defines specialty coffee in the green bean phase: a coffee that has no defects and has a distinctive character in the cup. The grade just below specialty, labeled as "premium," helps to clarify the issue even further. The premium grade also has no primary defects, but does not necessarily evidence distinctive character. This clarification, more than any other, helps start the definition for specialty on the right note. It is not only that the coffee doesn't taste bad; to be considered specialty it must be notably good.
The next phase is roasting, and here is where there is a lot of opportunity in our industry to continually define specialty. The SCAA Roast Color Classification System developed with noted industry scientist Carl Staub gave us a valuable measure for controlling roast development. Still, every coffee in combination with every roaster has a potential to express itself in a way that will be most satisfying for every customer. Bringing out a coffee's distinctive character is the roastmaster's challenge and if they come close to succeeding then it is still specialty if it started out in the green form as specialty. A roaster cannot take a coffee beyond the potential it contained when it came off the tree and was processed; but they can certainly fail to bring it close.
In roasted coffee, most agree freshness is part of the definition for specialty. The consensus breaks down in attempting to develop guidelines for freshness. At SCAA, we are concerned that there are no established technical standards for evaluating this facet of coffee quality. While our Retail Roaster members focus on the issue of time-maintaining a 3 to 7 day window is optimum for best results-many of our Wholesale Roaster members contend that today's packaging technology greatly expands this period of time into weeks or even months. Beyond the issue of "who is right" in this debate lies the more compelling question of "how do we decide." In order to find consensus on the first question, we have to reach agreement on the second. It is true that good coffee, well-roasted, and packaged in conditions that prevent oxidation, will brew up a flavorful cup of coffee. The scientific question is whether the packaging can retain the aromatic properties of the coffee that helped make it "special". My experience as a Retail Roaster suggests that "while the tongue may tell, only the nose knows for certain." Therefore, if the coffee is not highly aromatic then it no longer deserves to be called "specialty." The important job for SCAA is to quantify this aspect of quality into a good technical standard. This won't be an easy task.
Then there is the brewing phase. There are many ways in which you can extract the most flavorful soluble materials of roasted coffee into water, and they are best-organized into methods of how the water moves. Steeping methods like the French Press give a different flavor of beverage than drip methods or espresso, even when you use the same coffee. All are capable of brewing beverages that can qualify as specialty coffee, but only if done correctly. The right recipe of coffee to water, the right grind suited to the method and the coffee's physical characteristics, the proper water temperature and contact time, a good preparation of the coffee "bed" or "cake" are all fundamentals that must be satisfied to produce a specialty cup of coffee. For example, I believe that it takes at least 100 hours, or the preparation of at least 1,000 shots of espresso, under demanding tutelage, before anyone should consider themselves anything more than a trainee-barista. It takes several hours of trial and testing before any combination of brewer and grinder is fit to brew a Golden Cup. Unfortunately, many coffee companies do not allocate enough investment in training and quality control to meet the standards for brewing specialty coffee.
There are some great stories and marvelous promotions out there in our industry from people claiming that they have the "best" coffee, and that they work hard to produce specialty coffee. It does take a lot of work to produce specialty, and it is not always tangibly clear (especially to the managing accountants and financial investors) that the customers can tell the difference. There is sometimes a tendency to rely more upon telling a good story and creating a good promotion than putting out all of the effort that is required to offer specialty coffee consistently. But, it is my opinion that those who will succeed in the long term, building a loyal clientele and generating a healthy and sustainable return on investment for their company, are going to be the ones who are spending more attention and resources on training and quality control than they are on marketing. Check the financial statements. If expenditures on advertising and marketing are greater than on training and quality control, what is being sold? I would suggest that it is probably not specialty coffee.
Specialty coffee is, in the end, defined in the cup. It takes many steps to deliver that cup into the customers' hands. Each of those steps can uphold the classification of specialty if quality has been maintained throughout all the preceding steps. Given all of the effort that it takes to produce specialty coffee, and given how pleasurable such a cup can be, we should all jealously guard our definition for it, protect its meaning and credibility, and only use the word specialty when it is worth it.
This Article May be Reprinted in Part or in Whole with Attribution to Author and the Specialty Coffee Association of America"
-
-
I think this is exactly why people have moved on to such terms as "Third Wave." There is so much confusion, especially amongst consumers, and the term has been co-opted long ago. Not that 3W won't, but with the Internet it might be easier to discern fact from frontin'.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
Barista Exchange Partners
Barista Exchange Friends
Keep Barista Exchange Free
Are you enjoying Barista Exchange? Is it helping you promote your business and helping you network in this great industry? Donate today to keep it free to all members. Supporters can join the "Supporters Group" with a donation. Thanks!
© 2024 Created by Matt Milletto.
Powered by
